Senator Yisa Braimoh represented Edo North in the Senate from 2007 to
2011 on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and was vice
chairman of the Committee on Culture, Tourism and National Orientation.
In this interview with select journalists, he speaks on recent
rumblings in the Senate and the National Conference among others.
How would you assess the current politics in the Senate
where some former governors have been throwing their weights behind an
agenda to upset the PDP majority and the leadership of David Mark?
I
have long, before now, expressed serious concern at the rate at which
sitting governors, who, in a bid to negotiate their exit from office at
the threshold of their constitutionally prescribed two terms of eight
years, have gravitated to the Senate for refuge.
The
trend, from all indications, will continue and will certainly not augur
well for the Senate which is seen as an enclave of equals with the
Senate President as first among equals. Once these governors have made
up their minds to go to the Senate, it does not matter whether the
incumbent senators they seek to replace are doing well and deserving of
re-election.
They mobilize state machinery to clinch
the party
ticket and also to win in the general election. Now, the experience has
been that these former governors in the senate do not contribute to the
progress of legislative activities; but rather, they have constituted
themselves into some power cult with which they have caused political
unease in the Senate. This has been the sad narrative in the past ten
months or thereabout, particularly since the advent of the All
Progressives Congress (APC) through the merger of the Action Congress of
Nigeria (ACN), Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) and the All
Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP), with legislators jostling and threatening
to defect from the PDP to the APC.
In the Senate, three former
governors who served on the PDP platform-two from North Central and one
from North East zones-have been holding the Senate to ransom, and giving
the leadership sleepless nights. They have also become consequential
“caucus” leaders in the Upper Chamber irrespective of political party
affiliations. The mentality of these former governors is such that they
still imagine themselves as being in a position to bark out
instructions and manipulate their followers.
They do not want to
recognize the fact that the Senate is different from the fiefdoms into
which governors have converted their states.
At the moment there
are about 18 serving governors who are finishing their second term who
are jostling for the 8th Senate in 2015. The implication of this is
that in 2015, about 25 former governors may be in the Senate with their
gubernatorial tendencies and dispositions.
My fear is that they
may transform into Gubernatorial Senators’ Forum, seek to take over the
leadership of the Upper Chamber and use the platform, at their whims and
pleasure, to seek to sway political powers in Nigeria like the
Governors’ Forum has been doing.
How can it be a threat to the stability of the Senate?
Anything
that threatens the leadership of the Senate threatens the stability of
the institution of the Senate especially when you have a leadership that
is a binding force in the Senate. Consider the present leadership
under David Mark: sharply focused, consistent and persistent as far as
observing the standing rules is concerned. He has demonstrated
legerdemain in running the affairs of the Upper House.
Legislative acumen
Mark
has been able to clear the Office of the Senate President of banana
peels. He cannot be faulted on those general matters of administration
and legislative acumen.
But I consider the planned defection of
some senators from PDP to APC as masterminded by two former governors
from the North Central zone and another one from the North East zone as
one of the first steps in the direction of upsetting the leadership of
the senate.
Their calculations were that if they defected and were
able to secure the majority seats in the Senate, they would effect a
change in the senate leadership. This is the political nuisance that I
am against. Serving and former members of the Senate should work
together to put down these shenanigans.
They should not be allowed
to destabilize the Senate with their ill-gotten wealth, with which they
would be ready, at all times, to influence and control voting patterns
on motions and executive bills.
If they are not stopped now and the trend continues in 2015 through to 2019 and 2023, I can only say: God save Nigeria.
You are from the South-south zone. What is your position on the National Conference?
The
National Conference has come at a right time. There is the necessity
for our people, ethnic nationalities, groups, et al, to talk and that is
what the President Goodluck Jonathan administration has made possible.
End of the exercise
I
expect that the conference will discuss everything under the sun save
the unity of Nigeria, which the government had already listed as a no-go
area; and that at the end of the exercise, the outcome will conduce to
the emergence of a better Nigeria.
Is the Southern region ready to
present a unified position at the conference against the backdrop of
the resolution at Southern Leaders’ Summit that held recently in Calabar
ahead of the conference?
I think it is high time the Southern
region began to speak with one voice. Even at the level of South-south
geo-political zone, there should be unison of position on issues that
affect the zone. And to achieve this, we should not dissipate energy
and resources in pushing a plethora of groups. We should work towards
having one group so that we can effectively speak with one voice.
At
the Calabar meeting, the issue of harmonizing the positions of the
South-South Peoples Assembly and the Southern Leaders’ Forum came up.
I
sincerely believe that we should not be talking about unifying
positions; rather, we should be talking of unifying the groups into one
so that we can have one leadership. Once we have one leadership, we
will be able to speak with one voice.
No comments:
Post a Comment